Skip to main content

Armstrong claims in Desire and Domestic Fiction that, in separating virtue and desire from political motivation—in making identity apolitical—the novel challenged dominant societal paradigms. I argue that even though Richardson used the epistolary form to bolster the novel’s believability, Pamela was clearly an ideal member of her gender, not a particular person, and as such her gender stands in contrast to her identity, rather than her gender forming her identity.